NG stands for Not Graded. It appears on an NEB result when a subject's score falls below the passing threshold, roughly 35 percent, in that subject's combined theory and internal or practical marks. NEB does not use the word fail on results; NG is the official term, and it is marked separately for each subject rather than for the result as a whole.
You refresh the result page one more time, type in your symbol number and date of birth again just to be sure, and there it is: five subjects with clean letter grades, and one that just says NG. For a second it does not even register as a grade. It looks like an error, a placeholder, something the system forgot to fill in. It is not an error. It is a real, specific piece of information, and once you understand what it is actually telling you, it stops feeling like a mystery and starts looking like a to-do item with a clear next step. This page walks through exactly what NG means, why NEB chose this term over the old-fashioned word fail, the situations where it tends to show up, the myths that make it feel scarier than it is, and the two concrete paths for clearing it.
Why NG Appears on a Result
NEB grades every subject on the same A+ to NG scale used across SEE, Class 11 and Class 12, a scale explained in full in our NEB grading system guide. A subject is marked NG when its final combined score, theory plus internal or practical marks depending on the subject, falls below the D grade band. In practice this generally means below roughly 35 percent, though the exact combined calculation can vary slightly by subject depending on how theory and practical marks are weighted for that subject. NG carries a grade point of 0.0, the lowest point on the scale, and it is calculated the same mechanical way every other grade band is calculated. There is no separate, harsher process applied to NG specifically; the subject simply landed in the lowest of the eight available bands.
It helps to remember that grading is subject-specific and mechanical, not a judgment call made about the student as a whole. An examiner or the exam board does not decide a student has "failed"; a raw score simply falls into a numeric range, and that range has a label. For NG, that label happens to sit at the bottom of the scale, but it is generated by the exact same process that produces an A+ at the top.
A Short History: Why NEB Stopped Using "Fail"
For decades, Nepal's school-leaving exam, the old SLC, used a single blunt outcome: pass or fail, printed starkly on a certificate that followed a student around for years. A student who fell short in one subject out of eight carried the same "failed" label as a student who struggled across the board, and that certificate rarely explained which subject, or by how much. It is part of why the old SLC earned its reputation as the "Iron Gate", a single unforgiving checkpoint with almost no nuance in how it reported the outcome.
When Nepal's education system moved to letter grading and eventually replaced the SLC with the current SEE and NEB structure, the shift was not just cosmetic. Subject-wise grading was a deliberate redesign: instead of one verdict for the whole exam, each subject gets its own grade, its own grade point, and its own path forward if it does not clear. NG is a product of that redesign, not a relic of the old system with a new coat of paint. It exists specifically so that a strong result with one weak subject is not treated the same as a result that struggled everywhere.
NG vs "Fail": Why the Terminology Still Matters
Older Nepali examination systems used a single overall fail mark on a certificate. NEB's letter grading system replaced that with subject-wise grading, where NG is simply the lowest band on the same scale every other grade sits on. This is a deliberate design choice: it avoids labeling the whole result as a failure when the actual issue may be limited to one subject, and it gives a specific, resolvable target, that one subject, rather than an all-or-nothing outcome.
The distinction is not just semantics. A student who "failed" under the old system had, in practice, one option: repeat the entire year and sit every subject again. A student with NG in one subject today has a narrower, faster problem to solve, and NEB runs a process specifically built for that narrower problem. See the supplementary exam guide for how that works in practice.
NG Applies Per Subject, Not to Your Whole Result
This is the detail most students miss, and it is worth repeating as plainly as possible: NG in one subject does not erase your grades in the other subjects. A student with A+ in four subjects and NG in one still has those four A+ grades recorded exactly as earned. Nothing about those other four subjects gets recalculated, flagged, or held up because of the fifth. What remains outstanding is that one subject, and that is what needs to be resolved, not the entire academic year.
Picture a five-subject gradesheet: English A+, Nepali A, Physics B+, Chemistry B, and Mathematics NG. That student's GPA average will be pulled down by the zero grade point in Mathematics, and their overall qualification will show as incomplete until Mathematics is cleared. But English, Nepali, Physics and Chemistry are done. Nobody re-sits a subject they already passed just because a different subject didn't clear.
Common Situations Where NG Shows Up
NG is not evenly distributed across a random group of students. A few patterns show up again and again, and recognizing which one applies to you is often the fastest way to figure out what to do next.
None of these situations are unusual, and none of them say anything permanent about a student's ability. They are simply the practical reasons one subject out of several can land below the threshold while the rest do not.
What NG Does Not Mean
Because NG is an unfamiliar term the first time a student sees it, a few myths tend to spread faster than the facts. It is worth clearing them up directly.
Your other subjects keep their earned grades exactly as they are. NG is isolated to the specific subject it appears on.
The grade increment exam exists specifically so eligible students can clear a small number of NG subjects without repeating everything.
Once the subject is cleared through the supplementary exam or corrected through re-totaling, your record reflects the resolved grade.
Grading is a mechanical process applied to a raw score. If you have specific reason to doubt the totaling, re-totaling is the tool for that, not an assumption of unfairness.
How to Clear an NG Subject
There are two distinct paths, and they apply to different situations. Picking the right one the first time saves weeks.
Choosing the wrong process wastes time, since re-totaling will not help if the marks were genuinely below the threshold, and the supplementary exam will not help if the actual issue was a totaling error. If you are unsure which situation applies to you, your school's exam section can advise based on your specific gradesheet. And if the NG is on your Class 12 result specifically, the NEB Class 12 result guide ties all of this back to the official checking process and current result status.
Frequently Asked Questions
Sources
National Examination Board, Nepal
Official results and notices, including subject-wise grading terminology.
Curriculum Development Centre, Government of Nepal
Letter Grading Directive defining the NG grade band and grade point.
Published: August 2026. Last Updated: August 20, 2026. This explanation covers the current, ongoing meaning of NG under NEB's grading system, not a single year's result.
NG simply marks one subject as not yet cleared under NEB's per-subject grading system, not a judgment on the whole result. Identify the specific subject, decide whether re-totaling or the supplementary exam fits your situation, and work through the linked process guide for that path.